Steel Dossier
A controversial private intelligence report containing allegations of conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, which Gabbard describes as a 'manufactured political document that was filled with falsehoods' and was used as a source for the official intelligence assessment.
First Mentioned
9/16/2025, 6:29:57 AM
Last Updated
9/16/2025, 6:34:39 AM
Research Retrieved
9/16/2025, 6:34:39 AM
Summary
The Steel Dossier, also known as the Trump–Russia dossier, is a controversial political opposition research report compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele for Fusion GPS, funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee. It consists of 17 memos, totaling 35 pages, written between June and December 2016, containing unverified allegations of misconduct and conspiracy between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government. According to Tulsi Gabbard, serving as Director of National Intelligence, the Steel Dossier was an unreliable source leveraged in what she describes as a "Russiagate Hoax." She alleges this was a deliberate campaign of politicized intelligence orchestrated by the outgoing Obama Administration to undermine Trump's presidency, involving figures like James Clapper, John Brennan, and James Comey. Gabbard claims the dossier was used to reverse an initial Intelligence Community assessment that found no Russian interference in the 2016 election and to justify the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane investigation, including the use of allegedly illegal FISA court warrants. She compares its use to the flawed intelligence that led to the Iraq War. As ODNI Director, Gabbard is declassifying related documents and has referred findings to the Department of Justice for accountability.
Referenced in 1 Document
Research Data
Extracted Attributes
Type
Political opposition research report, compilation of 'unverified, and potentially unverifiable' memos, raw intelligence
Author
Christopher Steele
Client
Hillary Clinton's campaign, Democratic National Committee (DNC)
Content
Allegations of misconduct, conspiracy, and cooperation between Trump's presidential campaign and the government of Russia
Compiler
Fusion GPS
Reliability
Unreliable, questionable, bogus, compiled from hearsay and third-hand gossip, denied by sources, not established facts but a starting point for further investigation
Total Pages
35 pages
Also Known As
Trump–Russia dossier
Number of Reports
17 memos
Primary Sub-Source
Igor Danchenko
Timeline
- Christopher Steele began compiling the dossier. (Source: web_search_results)
2016-06
- Compilation of the dossier concluded. (Source: web_search_results)
2016-12
- US intelligence chiefs briefed President Barack Obama and President-elect Donald Trump on Russia's election meddling, including some details from Steele's dossier. (Source: web_search_results)
2017-01
- BuzzFeed News published the Steele dossier in its entirety. (Source: web_search_results)
2017-01
- The Wall Street Journal named Christopher Steele as the dossier's author. (Source: web_search_results)
2017-01-11
- Igor Danchenko, Steele's primary sub-source, became a paid informant for the FBI. (Source: web_search_results)
2017
- Igor Danchenko's role as a paid informant for the FBI concluded. (Source: web_search_results)
2020
- Igor Danchenko was acquitted of lying to the FBI regarding the dossier. (Source: web_search_results)
2022-10
- Tulsi Gabbard, as Director of National Intelligence, is declassifying documents related to the Steel Dossier and the alleged Russiagate Hoax, and has referred findings to the Department of Justice for accountability. (Source: related_documents)
Present
Web Search Results
- Steele dossier - Wikipedia
The Steele dossier, also known as the Trump–Russia dossier, is a controversial political opposition research report on the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump compiled by counterintelligence specialist Christopher Steele. It was published without permission in 2017 as an unfinished 35-page compilation of "unverified, and potentially unverifiable" memos that were considered by Steele to be "raw intelligence – not established facts, but a starting point for further investigation". The [...] dossier was written from June to December 2016 and contains allegations of misconduct, conspiracy, and cooperation between Trump's presidential campaign and the government of Russia prior to and during the 2016 election campaign. U.S. intelligence agencies have reported that Putin personally ordered the whole Russian election interference operation, that the Russians codenamed Project Lakhta. [...] The dossier was based on reports from initially anonymous sources known to Steele and his "primary sub-source", Igor Danchenko. Steele, a former head of the Russia Desk for British intelligence (MI6), wrote the report for the private investigative firm Fusion GPS, that was paid by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The dossier's 17 reports allege that there was a "well-developed conspiracy" of "cooperation" between Trump campaign members and Russian
- The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective - Lawfare
The dossier compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele remains a subject of fascination—or, depending on your perspective, scorn. Indeed, it was much discussed during former FBI Director Jim Comey’s testimony in front of the House Judiciary Committee on Dec. 7. Published almost two years ago by BuzzFeed News in January 2017, the document received significant public attention, first for its lurid details regarding Donald Trump’s pre-presidential alleged sexual escapades [...] The dossier is actually a series of reports—16 in all—that total 35 pages. Written in 2016, the dossier is a collection of raw intelligence. Steele neither evaluated nor synthesized the intelligence. He neither made nor rendered bottom-line judgments. The dossier is, quite simply and by design, raw reporting, not a finished intelligence product. [...] Our interest in revisiting the compilation that has come to be called the “Steele Dossier” concerns neither of those topics, at least not directly. Rather, we returned to the document because we wondered whether information made public as a result of the Mueller investigation—and the passage of two years—has tended to buttress or diminish the crux of Steele’s original reporting. Support _Lawfare_
- Behind the dossier: How Christopher Steele penned his reports
Over the course of the next six months, Steele would file 17 memos to Fusion GPS and its client, a law firm representing the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. The salacious claims in the so-called "Steele dossier" -- involving sex, spies, and scandal -- are well known by now. But details of how Steele gathered the intelligence, and the personal toll of its fallout, have remained shrouded. [...] American news outlets were reporting that the intelligence chiefs had briefed President Barack Obama and President-elect Trump on Russia's election meddling -- and included some of the details from Steele's dossier. Steele's name hadn't yet been reported, but he assumed it was only a matter of time. Later that day, BuzzFeed News published Steele's dossier in its entirety. On January 11, The Wall Street Journal named Steele as the dossier's author. [...] "It's not at all usual for me to be in the public eye, but we've been there for five years," Steele said. "Because the vitriol and the things that people have said about us and our motivations and our work are so far-fetched and untrue, I thought it was important to come and set the record straight." Out of the Shadows: The Man Behind the Steele Dossier" is available Monday, October 18, on Hulu. ### The 'dossier' takes shape
- Trump-Russia Steele dossier source acquitted of lying to FBI - BBC
The Steele dossier, published by news website Buzzfeed 10 days before Mr Trump took office, made a number of explosive claims linking Mr Trump to the Kremlin - including that Russia had compromising material on the Republican candidate. Mr Danchenko had reportedly worked with ex-British spy Christopher Steele on the dossier. He went on to become a paid informant for the FBI between 2017-20. He appeared emotional as the verdict was read, and did not comment after the hearing. [...] Mr Steele, a former British spy, was hired to compile the dossier by Washington DC-based research firm Fusion GPS, which was itself retained by a law firm on behalf of Mr Trump's political opponents, Hillary Clinton, the Democratic candidate in the 2016 election, and the Democratic National Committee. According to the federal indictment, a US-based public relations executive "who was a long-time participant in Democratic Party politics" was "a contributor of information" to the dossier. [...] # Trump-Russia Steele dossier source acquitted of lying to FBI Getty Images Danchenko entering court A Russian analyst who worked on a discredited dossier linking Donald Trump to Russia has been found not guilty of lying to the FBI. The Department of Justice charged Igor Danchenko, 43, as part of a probe into the FBI's inquiry into whether Mr Trump colluded with Russia to win in 2016. The so-called Steele dossier was used by the FBI to obtain surveillance warrants on a top Trump aide.
- Why Was The Steele Dossier Not Dismissed As A Fake?
We now know that the Steele Dossier is bogus. Inspector General Michael Horowitz drove the final stake through its heart. He found that the Dossier was compiled from hearsay and third-hand gossip from two low-level sources and that they denied the testimony attributed to them. The only “verified” information that Horowitz found was available from public sources. [...] The Steele Dossier fails a second key smell test with its claim that Igor Sechin, Putin’s right-hand man and CEO of Rosneft (Russia’s national oil company), offered a low-level Trump campaign advisor, Carter Page, a whacky deal that defies belief and credulity. Here is how Steele describes the secret Moscow meeting in July of 2016 between Sechin and Page, identified as part of the US Republican presidential candidate's foreign policy team: [...] A cursory examination of the Steele Dossier should have convinced the CIA or the FBI that it was fake news. Any residual doubt would have vanished after learning that its author, Christopher Steele, was an opposition researcher paid by the Democrats to dig up dirt on Trump. That our most sophisticated government officials acted as if the Dossier were legitimate leads to only one conclusion. They were a knowing and willing part of the Democratic and media smear of a presidential contender, and