Government Incompetence
A central theme of the discussion, referring to the failure of city and state leadership to effectively manage crises like the LA Wildfires, handle rebuilding efforts, and address issues like homelessness.
First Mentioned
8/20/2025, 4:50:11 AM
Last Updated
10/3/2025, 4:34:29 AM
Research Retrieved
10/1/2025, 4:18:58 AM
Summary
Government incompetence refers to a perceived failure of governmental bodies to effectively manage and address societal issues, often characterized by a lack of foresight, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and poor leadership. This concept is exemplified by the response to the LA wildfires, which critics like Rick Caruso and the All-In Podcast hosts (Jason Calacanis, Chamath Palihapitiya, David Friedberg, Sayan Bannister) identified as a catastrophic failure of governance, specifically citing Mayor Karen Bass's administration's inaction. The Peter Principle, a management theory developed by Laurence J. Peter and Raymond Hull and published in 1969, provides a theoretical framework for how individuals can rise to a level of incompetence within hierarchies, contributing to systemic governmental failures. Discussions around this topic often link it to broader issues such as homelessness, urban decay, and policy failures like the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and market-distorting policies by the Department of Insurance. The concept is frequently contrasted with the perceived effectiveness of private sector approaches and can even lead to considerations of federal intervention, such as deploying the National Guard, when local leadership is perceived to have failed.
Referenced in 2 Documents
Research Data
Extracted Attributes
Definition
Perceived failure of governmental bodies to effectively manage and address societal issues.
Criticized by
Rick Caruso, All-In Podcast hosts (Jason Calacanis, Chamath Palihapitiya, David Friedberg, Sayan Bannister).
Contrasted With
Private sector approaches, private firefighting efforts, business-like focus on results, limited effective government.
Associated Problems
Homelessness, urban decay, insurance crisis, deteriorating basic services (e.g., garbage pickup, park maintenance).
Core Characteristics
Lack of foresight, bureaucratic inefficiencies, poor leadership, lack of long-term planning, red tape, lack of transparency, unreliability.
Policy Failures Cited
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Department of Insurance market-distorting policies, misprioritization of DEI.
Theoretical Framework
The Peter Principle (individuals promoted to a level of incompetence).
Potential Extreme Consequence
Discussions of federal intervention (e.g., National Guard deployment).
Proponents of Peter Principle
Laurence J. Peter, Raymond Hull.
Timeline
- The book 'The Peter Principle', which introduced the concept of individuals rising to a level of incompetence in hierarchical organizations, was published by Laurence J. Peter and Raymond Hull. (Source: wikipedia)
1969-01-01
Wikipedia
View on WikipediaPeter principle
The Peter principle is a concept in management developed by Laurence J. Peter which observes that people in a hierarchy tend to rise to "a level of respective incompetence": employees are promoted based on their success in previous jobs until they reach a level at which they are no longer competent, as skills in one job do not necessarily translate to another. The concept was explained in the 1969 book The Peter Principle (William Morrow and Company) by Laurence Peter and Raymond Hull. Hull wrote the text, which was based on Peter's research. Peter and Hull intended the book to be satire, but it became popular as it was seen to make a serious point about the shortcomings of how people are promoted within hierarchical organizations. The Peter principle has since been the subject of much commentary and research.
Web Search Results
- Ten Secret Truths About Government Incompetence
The federal government spends $1 trillion per year on Medicare, Medicaid, and related programs, but private and nonprofit medical facilities actually provide the care. Estimates of waste and improper payments in the Medicare program range as high as $120 billion a year, but you can’t reduce that without getting a handle on people outside government who don’t work for you—and to them, that $120 billion isn’t waste, it’s a windfall they’ll fight to keep. In an August column in the Washington Post, the political scientist John DiIulio asked, “Want better, smaller government?” His answer: “Hire another million federal bureaucrats.” We have no hope of making government work, he wrote, if we don’t hire the government we need to run it—and to rein in the proxies who do so much of the government’s work on its behalf.
- The Unbearable Incompetence of Government
California, Energy and Environment, Governance, Permitting Reform, Restoring the First Branch, State Policy, Transparency And yet, while the federal, state, and local government should be limited in scope, it’s imperative that those few, basic functions it does perform, be done *well*. The public especially lost confidence in their government when it came to specific concerns around “transparency” and “reliability.” When faced with disaster, local government *also* fails to uphold its basic commitment to its constituents. We’ve long advocated for free markets and limited government, but what we need is so much more. We need limited, *effective* government that oversees and manages the most basic functions of its community so that we can ensure a safe and functioning society, and restore the public’s confidence.
- Government failure
Examples· Economic crowding out · Regulatory · Distortion of markets · State monopolies · Corruption.
- Ten Secret Truths About Government Incompetence
The federal government spends $1 trillion per year on Medicare, Medicaid, and related programs, but private and nonprofit medical facilities actually provide the care. Estimates of waste and improper payments in the Medicare program range as high as $120 billion a year, but you can’t reduce that without getting a handle on people outside government who don’t work for you—and to them, that $120 billion isn’t waste, it’s a windfall they’ll fight to keep. In an August column in the *Washington Post*, the political scientist John DiIulio asked, “Want better, smaller government?” His answer: “Hire another million federal bureaucrats.” We have no hope of making government work, he wrote, if we don’t hire the government we need to run it—and to rein in the proxies who do so much of the government’s work on its behalf.
- The Incompetence of Local Government
When deadly fires tore across the island of Maui in early August, killing around 100 people and destroying thousands of homes and businesses, the public quickly learned that much of the destruction could have been prevented had local officials simply done their jobs. Despite high tax rates in many cities and towns, citizens still experience regular failures of basic functions of local government, from picking up garbage to keeping parks and other public areas clean and safe to simply making employees available to answer questions about city services. Deteriorating services by local government combined with partisan moralizing by public officials breeds cynicism in, and has a demoralizing effect on, the people these officials are supposed to govern.