Apple's AI position
Apple's current standing in the AI race is viewed as weak and lacking a clear strategy. The company is criticized for a lack of innovation, failing to acquire key AI talent or companies, and transitioning into a 'cash cow' rather than a growth business, despite having immense resources.
entitydetail.created_at
7/19/2025, 8:28:53 AM
entitydetail.last_updated
7/22/2025, 5:14:31 AM
entitydetail.research_retrieved
7/19/2025, 8:34:01 AM
Summary
Apple's AI position is widely criticized for being stagnant and not keeping pace with the aggressive strategies of major tech rivals like Meta and Google, who are heavily investing in AI and developing advanced models such as Gemini. While competitors pursue deep vertical integration in AI and explore markets like humanoid robots and ambient AI assistants, Apple is perceived as missing out on these significant future opportunities. Despite this criticism, Apple's strategy prioritizes on-device intelligence, user privacy, and ecosystem longevity, aiming to be a neutral, trusted platform. The company has advantages in its vast installed base of over a billion iPhones, on-device data, and custom silicon chips, but its 'Apple Intelligence' features have been underwhelming, and Siri's performance lags behind rivals. Apple has reportedly reorganized its AI teams and is developing its own large language model, codenamed 'Ajax', with a focus on a hybrid architecture that balances on-device processing with cloud capabilities.
Referenced in 1 Document
Research Data
Extracted Attributes
Internal LLM
Codenamed 'Ajax'
Key Advantages
Installed base of over 1 billion iPhones, on-device data, custom-designed silicon chips
Strategic Focus
On-device intelligence, privacy-centric, hybrid architecture, long-term user trust, ecosystem longevity
Siri Performance
Considered underwhelming compared to rivals like ChatGPT and Google Gemini
Competitive Stance
Perceived as missing out on significant future markets like humanoid robots and ambient AI assistants
Overall Perception
Broadly criticized as stagnant and lagging behind competitors
AI Strategy Analogy
Positioning itself as the 'Switzerland' of AI models, a neutral, trusted, and secure platform layer
Financial Resources
$133 billion in cash and marketable securities (as of May)
Timeline
- The rapid development of generative AI and the release of ChatGPT reportedly blindsided Apple executives, forcing a refocus on AI efforts. (Source: web_search_results)
2022-12-01
- It was first reported that Apple was creating its own internal large language model, codenamed 'Ajax'. (Source: web_search_results)
2023-07-01
- Apple was reportedly on track to release new generative AI features into its operating systems by 2024, including a significantly redeveloped Siri. (Source: web_search_results)
2023-10-01
- Apple CEO Tim Cook stated in an earnings call that the company was spending a 'tremendous amount of time and effort' into AI features that would be shared 'later that year'. (Source: web_search_results)
2024-02-01
- Apple Intelligence was launched at WWDC, though it was later described as having 'stumbled out of the gate'. (Source: web_search_results)
2024-06-01
- At WWDC, Apple acknowledged that many of the features promised in the 2024 Apple Intelligence launch were behind schedule, with Senior Vice President of Software Engineering Craig Federighi stating that work on Siri needed more time. (Source: web_search_results)
2025-06-01
Wikipedia
View on WikipediaArtificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence (AI) is the capability of computational systems to perform tasks typically associated with human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and decision-making. It is a field of research in computer science that develops and studies methods and software that enable machines to perceive their environment and use learning and intelligence to take actions that maximize their chances of achieving defined goals. There is debate over whether artificial intelligence exhibits genuine intelligence or merely simulates it by imitating human-like behaviors. High-profile applications of AI include advanced web search engines (e.g., Google Search); recommendation systems (used by YouTube, Amazon, and Netflix); virtual assistants (e.g., Google Assistant, Siri, and Alexa); autonomous vehicles (e.g., Waymo); generative and creative tools (e.g., language models and AI art); and superhuman play and analysis in strategy games (e.g., chess and Go). However, many AI applications are not perceived as AI: "A lot of cutting edge AI has filtered into general applications, often without being called AI because once something becomes useful enough and common enough it's not labeled AI anymore." Various subfields of AI research are centered around particular goals and the use of particular tools. The traditional goals of AI research include learning, reasoning, knowledge representation, planning, natural language processing, perception, and support for robotics. To reach these goals, AI researchers have adapted and integrated a wide range of techniques, including search and mathematical optimization, formal logic, artificial neural networks, and methods based on statistics, operations research, and economics. AI also draws upon psychology, linguistics, philosophy, neuroscience, and other fields. Some companies, such as OpenAI, Google DeepMind and Meta, aim to create artificial general intelligence (AGI)—AI that can complete virtually any cognitive task at least as well as a human. Artificial intelligence was founded as an academic discipline in 1956, and the field went through multiple cycles of optimism throughout its history, followed by periods of disappointment and loss of funding, known as AI winters. Funding and interest vastly increased after 2012 when graphics processing units started being used to accelerate neural networks and deep learning outperformed previous AI techniques. This growth accelerated further after 2017 with the transformer architecture. In the 2020s, an ongoing period of rapid progress in advanced generative AI became known as the AI boom. Generative AI's ability to create and modify content has led to several unintended consequences and harms, which has raised ethical concerns about AI's long-term effects and potential existential risks, prompting discussions about regulatory policies to ensure the safety and benefits of the technology.
Web Search Results
- Apple AI: Strategy of Why On Device Intelligence Will Win - Klover.ai
_Table 3: Comparative AI Strategy Analysis (Apple vs. Google vs. Microsoft vs. Meta)_ Ultimately, Apple’s strategy is to become the “Switzerland” of AI models. It is positioning itself as the neutral, trusted, and secure platform layer that controls the gateway to the world’s most valuable user base. The Long Game for Apple AI: Research, Investment, & Redefining Intelligence =============================================================================== [...] war of attrition in the cloud, Apple is quietly engineering a silent revolution on the edge. The company’s perceived “lag” is not a failure of capability but a “deliberate exercise in restraint” that prioritizes long-term user trust and ecosystem longevity over the fleeting publicity of frontier model announcements. Apple has chosen credibility over velocity, positioning AI as an ambient utility rather than a flashy centerpiece. [...] This comprehensive analysis reveals that Apple’s perceived lag in the AI race is a profound misinterpretation. The company is executing a deliberate plan to dominate the next phase of the AI revolution: the era of deeply personal, on-device intelligence. By creating a hybrid architecture that weaponizes privacy, leveraging its unassailable ecosystem, offering an irresistible platform for developers, and creating a self-funding monetization flywheel, Apple is redefining the terms of victory to
- WWDC 2025: Apple's AI strategy comes into question - CNBC
Analysts said Apple’s installed base of more than 1 billion iPhones, the data on its device and its custom-designed silicon chips were advantages that would help the company become an AI leader. But it’s been an underwhelming 12 months since then. Apple Intelligence stumbled out of the gate while rivals like OpenAI, Google and Meta have continued to make headway launching new generative-AI models. [...] Although Apple Intelligence had a rough first year, the company hasn’t said much publicly. However, it’s reportedly reorganized some of its AI teams. JPMorgan Chase analyst Samik Chatterjee said in a note this week that investor expectations were set for a “lackluster” WWDC, as the company still needs to bring to market the features it announced last year, versus “addressing the more material issue of lagging behind other large technology companies in relation to advancements in AI.” [...] With $133 billion in cash and marketable securities on hand as of the start of May, there isn’t much Apple can’t buy, assuming it could get regulatory clearance. However, OpenAI, Apple’s current Siri partner, is likely out of reach with a valuation of $300 billion. And given OpenAI’s new relationship with Ive to build hardware, there are reasons for Apple to slow the partnership down.
- Apple's AI Approach: Innovation, Criticism, And The Road Ahead
"Apple isn’t leading in AI — and most users won’t notice Artificial intelligence is the hot technology of the 2020s, and Apple is far from the forefront in its development. OpenAI's ChatGPT chatbot makes Apple's Siri seem like a high school science project. Google Gemini creates pictures that make anything from Apple's Image Playground look laughable. The AI-enhanced version of Siri won't reach customers until a year after Apple initially expected. None of that matters, though. Not really. [...] At this year's WWDC in early June, Apple acknowledged that many of the things promised in the 2024 Apple Intelligence launch are behind. Apple's Senior Vice President of Software Engineering, Craig Federighi, stated, "We're continuing our work to deliver the features that make Siri even more personal. This work needed more time to reach our high-quality bar, and we look forward to sharing more about it in the coming year." [...] Skeptics also point to Apple's insistence on running AI models mostly on-device. While this approach protects privacy and improves speed, it limits the scale and complexity of AI features compared to cloud-based systems. Some developers and analysts believe this restricts Apple's ability to deliver truly transformative AI experiences. PROMOTED
- 'The illusion of thinking': Apple research finds AI models collapse ...
Apple was slow to develop large language models and implement AI in its devices, largely staying out of the conversation. The company has added Apple Intelligence AI features, though they have generally been considered underwhelming. In fact, after WWDC 2025, it's clear that Apple is going in a different direction with AI") than the rest of the industry. With that in mind, this research might explain some of Apple's reticence to go all-in, unlike Google and Samsung, which have frontloaded their
- Apple Intelligence - Wikipedia
The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence and the release of ChatGPT in late 2022 reportedly blindsided Apple executives and forced the company to refocus its efforts on AI.( In an interview with _Good Morning America_, Apple CEO Tim Cook stated that generative AI had "great promise" but had some potential dangers, and that it was "looking closely" at ChatGPT. It was first reported in July 2023 that Apple was creating its own internal large language model, codenamed "Ajax".( [...] According to a human evaluation done by Apple's machine learning division, the on-device foundation model beat or tied equivalent small models by Mistral AI, Microsoft, and Google, while the server foundation models beat the performance of OpenAI's GPT-3, while roughly matching the performance of GPT-4.( [...] In October 2023, Apple was reportedly on track to release new generative AI features into its operating systems by 2024, including a significantly redeveloped Siri.( In an earnings call in February 2024, Cook stated that the company was spending a "tremendous amount of time and effort" into AI features that would be shared "later that year".(