Vertical Integration in Healthcare
Identified by Mark Cuban as the 'original sin' of the US healthcare system, where large insurance companies become enormous and vertically integrated, allowing them to game the entire system.
First Mentioned
9/9/2025, 5:41:26 AM
Last Updated
9/9/2025, 5:47:17 AM
Research Retrieved
9/9/2025, 5:47:17 AM
Summary
Vertical integration in healthcare is a strategy involving the consolidation of various stages of patient care and services under a single organization, such as hospitals acquiring physician practices or insurance companies merging with providers. While proponents argue it can streamline operations, improve care coordination, and potentially reduce costs, empirical studies and expert opinions highlight significant downsides. It has been linked to reduced competition, higher prices for patients, increased healthcare costs, and, in some cases, adverse effects on patient health outcomes. Mark Cuban notably criticizes vertical integration, particularly in the context of Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), calling it the 'original sin' of the US Healthcare System due to its role in inflated costs and lack of transparency. This trend continues to reshape the U.S. healthcare landscape, prompting ongoing scrutiny from policymakers and researchers.
Referenced in 1 Document
Research Data
Extracted Attributes
Definition
Consolidation of various stages of patient care and services under a single organization.
Key Critic
Mark Cuban
Associated Trend
Significant rise in recent years, shaping the future of U.S. health care, market consolidation.
Intended Benefits
Streamline operations, improve care coordination, potentially reduce costs, reduction in redundant services, enhanced data sharing, increased negotiating power for drug pricing, improved patient outcomes, enhanced patient satisfaction.
Criticism by Mark Cuban
Labeled as the 'original sin' of the US Healthcare System, causing lack of transparency and inflated costs, especially with PBMs.
Examples of Consolidation
Hospitals acquiring physician practices, insurance companies merging with healthcare providers, health systems developing their own supply chains, PBMs consolidating control over insurance, PBM services, and pharmacies.
Documented Challenges/Downsides
Reduced competition, higher prices for patients, limited provider choices, increased healthcare costs, adverse effects on patient health outcomes, pressures physicians to change referral patterns, potential for duplicate structures in the supply chain, lack of transparency.
Timeline
- The Affordable Care Act (ACA) partially fueled a resurgence in efforts to promote integrated care. (Source: web_search_results)
2010
- Machta et al. published a systematic review examining vertical integration and its influence on quality of care, efficiency, and patient-centered outcomes in the U.S. (Source: web_search_results)
2018
- The Center for Advancing Health Policy through Research was launched, where Professor Christopher Whaley, who researches vertical integration, speaks. (Source: web_search_results)
2023
- Brown University published an article titled 'Vertical integration is shaping the future of U.S. health care' by Carl Dimitri, discussing its impact on costs, access, and competition. (Source: web_search_results)
2024-09-16
- Vertical Integration in Healthcare is discussed by Mark Cuban at the All-In Summit 2025, where he labels it the 'original sin' of the US Healthcare System. (Source: related_documents)
2025
Web Search Results
- Vertical Integration in Healthcare: The Key to Better Patient Care
How does vertical integration in healthcare impact patient care? Discover its benefits and long-term effects on treatment quality.
- Vertical Integration in Healthcare
Vertical integration is touted as a pathway to enhanced efficiency and patient care but comes with its own set of challenges and complexities.
- 403
Web page about Vertical Integration in Healthcare sourced during research.
- Vertical Integration | PLEXIS Healthcare Systems
PLEXIS proudly announces the 2025 User Conference in Ashland, Oregon September 14th - 16th!Visit the PLEXIS 2025 User Conference page to learn more.
- The Downside of Vertical Integration in Healthcare: Unraveling the Web of Consolidation - Ethos Benefits
In recent years, the healthcare landscape has witnessed a significant trend – the rise of vertical integration. This phenomenon involves consolidating different stages of the healthcare supply chain, with entities like health insurance companies acquiring pharmacy benefit managers and hospitals absorbing independent medical practices.
- Vertical Integration in Healthcare
Vertical integration in healthcare refers to the merging of different levels of the healthcare supply chain within a single organization. This can include hospitals, physician practices, insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, and other healthcare providers. [...] The healthcare industry is undergoing significant transformation, driven by a quest for improved efficiency, reduced costs, and enhanced patient care. One of the key strategies emerging as a response to these challenges is vertical integration. This concept, which involves the consolidation of various stages of production or service provision within a single company, is reshaping how healthcare organizations operate. Vertical integration is touted as a pathway to enhanced efficiency and patient [...] As the healthcare industry continues to evolve, vertical integration is likely to play an increasingly prominent role. However, it is essential to approach vertical integration with a balanced perspective, recognizing both its potential benefits and its challenges. Policymakers, regulators, and healthcare leaders must work to ensure that integration efforts enhance competition, protect patient interests, and contribute to the overarching goal of a more efficient, equitable, and effective
- Vertical integration and market consolidation in healthcare
In the case of healthcare, vertical integration theoretically promises improved coordination of care and more efficiently delivered, higher quality care. Consider the example of a hospital purchasing physician practices: it is reasonable to expect that when one entity oversees care across the outpatient and inpatient settings, information is transferred more efficiently and referrals are smoother, thus improving clinical outcomes. Particularly in the context of alternative payment models [...] As healthcare markets have become increasingly consolidated, the vertical integration of physician practices with hospital networks has drawn additional scrutiny. While vertical integration within healthcare was once predicted to improve efficiency and quality of healthcare delivery, empirical study has uncovered mixed results. In a review of existing literature, vertical integration has yielded inconsistent effects on health quality metrics, with modest improvements at best, but has [...] This concept, however, is being criticized because it could establish duplicate structures in the supply chain. Vertical integration in healthcare, where hospitals acquire physician practices, was elsewhere found to be counterproductive: In the US, the quality of care has not improved61 and, in some cases, has even worsened, despite increased costs.62 Similar effects are suggested from a cross-sector network of health, social, and community care providers in Hamburg-Billstedt, who have piloted
- Vertical Integration in Healthcare: Benefits and DOJ Task Force ...
Improved Care Coordination: Vertical integration can promote better coordination of care. By integrating different levels of care—such as primary care, specialty care, and hospital services—healthcare providers can reduce medical errors, improve patient outcomes, and enhance overall patient satisfaction. [...] Reduction in Redundant Services: Vertical integration can minimize redundant services and tests, which are often a result of poor communication and coordination among independent providers. Enhanced Data Sharing: Integrated healthcare systems can facilitate better data sharing among providers. This can, in turn, improve decision-making and patient care, and facilitate the ability to track and manage population health more effectively. [...] Furthermore, the logic behind vertical integration is precisely the same as that behind value-based payment models. Healthcare policy experts often agree on little, but they are almost universally united in believing we should move toward these value-based payment models and away from fee-for-service reimbursement. As recently noted by a group of leading experts in a National Academy of Medicine publication:
- Vertical integration is shaping the future of U.S. health care
Unlike large hospital mergers that are single, noticeable events, vertical integration happens incrementally. A hospital might acquire one physician practice this year, another the next, and so on, resulting in significant consolidation over time through small, individual transactions. Christopher Whaley Associate professor of health services, policy and practice [...] Skip to Main Content Date September 16, 2024 All News Share Facebook Twitter\_X Linkedin Email # Vertical integration is shaping the future of U.S. health care By Carl Dimitri With over half of America’s doctors now employed by large health systems rather than physician-owned practices, a team of Brown researchers is examining how this trend toward consolidation impacts health care costs, patient access and market competition. [...] “We’ve heard anecdotal evidence that vertical integration pressures physicians to change referral patterns, steering patients away from local facilities toward more expensive hospital settings, to essentially arbitrage that double payment rate and increase revenues,” Whaley said. “That’s really the type of behavior we wanted to look at in this study.” Professor Christopher Whaley (left) speaks at the launch of the Center for Advancing Health Policy through Research in 2023.
- Horizontal and Vertical Integration of Health Care Providers
For example, in a systematic review of literature examining vertical integration, Machta et al. (2018) found that vertical integration in the U.S. was associated with higher performance on some measures of quality (often measured for patient populations with specific conditions), but not for measures of cost or resource utilization, while evidence on the influence of vertical integration on patient-centered outcomes was lacking . In another review of the literature on integrated delivery [...] 41.Machta, RM, Maurer, KA, Jones, DJ, Furukawa, MF, Rich, EC. A Systematic Review of Vertical Integration and Quality of Care, Efficiency, and Patient-Centered Outcomes. Health Care Management Review, 2018. April; 45(1). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [...] of 2010, have in part fueled a resurgence in efforts to promote integrated care. Increasingly, hospitals, physicians, and other providers are consolidated into health systems [5,6]. This trend toward the vertical integration of various provider types has occurred while there has been a shift in U.S. policymaker attention to improving health outcomes and patient-centeredness as elements of health care value . The ACA established multiple programs and policies to test new delivery system and