Extreme Rhetoric
Inflammatory and divisive language used in politics. The podcast discusses how it leads to hate, extremism, and an inability to find common ground, with blame attributed to an 'attention economy'.
First Mentioned
10/3/2025, 4:44:51 AM
Last Updated
10/3/2025, 4:47:53 AM
Research Retrieved
10/3/2025, 4:47:53 AM
Summary
Extreme Rhetoric is a significant and growing concern in contemporary politics, characterized by its divisive nature, its tendency to demean opponents, and its role in narrowing understanding and hindering compromise. Representative Ro Khanna, a pragmatic progressive, has explicitly condemned its rise, linking it to broader issues such as censorship and lawfare. This form of rhetoric is seen as undermining democratic discourse, contributing to political polarization, and preventing productive societal engagement by fostering superficial bickering and aggression. It is often associated with extreme ideologies that hold rigid views and are willing to employ radical measures.
Referenced in 1 Document
Research Data
Extracted Attributes
Nature
Divisive, demeaning, deceptive
Consequences
Instigates controversy, hinders productive societal engagement, contributes to polarization
Associated Ideologies
Belief systems at the far ends of the ideological spectrum, characterized by rigid views and a willingness to use radical measures
Impact on Democratic Discourse
Narrows understanding, closes off compromise, undermines democratic promise
Wikipedia
View on WikipediaMike Davis (American lawyer)
Mike Davis is an American lawyer, conservative political strategist, adviser, and provocateur. He was Chief Counsel for Nominations to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and the founder and president of the Article III Project (A3P). He is a staunch defender and ally of Donald Trump and was rumored to be one of his candidates for Attorney General.
Web Search Results
- The Lure & Dangers of Extremist Rhetoric
But when it’s politically for real, extremist rhetoric has far less benign effects on democratic discourse: it demeans opponents, radically narrows understanding of the issue at hand, and closes off compromise. Extremist rhetoric insidiously undermines the democratic promise of mobilizing citizens on the basis of some reasonable understanding of their interest and the public interest. The problem for representative democracy, therefore, is that many people who are not ideological zealots manipulatively use extreme rhetoric for their own mutually disrespectful political ends–at the same time as zealots of all ideological stripes insidiously subvert the compromising spirit of democracy through their use of extremist rhetoric. Extreme and extremist rhetoric tends to divide, demean, and deceive democratic citizens.
- Significance loss as the rhetoric of extreme ideologies
by G Di Cicco · 2025 — Extreme ideologies are belief systems at the far ends of the ideological spectrum, characterized by rigid views and a willingness to use radical measures to
- The Polarizing Impact of Political Disinformation and Hate ...
by PN Vasist·2023·Cited by 105—Hate speech contributes to polarizationas well (Piazza, 2020), while state-controlled media with censorship efforts could also polarize societies (Zhu, 2019).
- Rhetoric
# Rhetoric | Rhetoric | Aristotle defined rhetoric as "the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion", and since mastery of the art was necessary for victory in a case at law, for passage of proposals in the assembly, or for fame as a speaker in civic ceremonies, he called it "a combination of the science of logic and of the ethical branch of politics". He writes, "I do think that the study of political discourse can help more than any other thing to stimulate and form such qualities of character." Aristotle, writing several years after Isocrates, supported many of his arguments and argued for rhetoric as a civic art. "Rhetoric". * "Rhetoric". * Rhetoric
- Divisive Rhetoric: The political messages limiting our ...
Nov 3, 2017—Negative rhetoriconly instigates controversy and people fail to be productive members ofsocietythrough superficial bickering, aggression,